| Prove your case, Starbucks By Ethical Corporation Magazine November 13, 2007 Claims of “union busting” are a drag on Starbucks’ good name
Starbucks finds itself in an unenviable position: being compared to Wal-Mart in its treatment of workers. How does a perennial leader on corporate social responsibility respond? Starbucks seems to be at a loss for an effective answer to accusations it is a “union buster”.
The coffee house giant is having either an unfortunate or telling run of labour rights confrontations with worker unions, particularly Industrial Workers of the World. Starbucks recently reached a non-monetary settlement agreement with the National Labor Relations Board over unionising efforts at a store in Grand Rapids, Michigan, at which the IWW says management “coercively interrogated” employees about union activities.
Starbucks has settled claims of “union busting” twice before in the past two years. At the time of writing, it is defending itself against 32 counts of unlawfully stifling organising activity at hearings being conducted by an administrative law judge in New York.
IWW says the coffee giant not only squelches union activity, but also misrepresents the generosity of the benefits it offers to workers. The union says only 42% of Starbucks’ workers are covered by its health insurance, putting the company in worse straits than even Wal-Mart, which insures 47% of its workforce.
Starbucks, one of the first companies in the US to offer comprehensive health benefits to part-time employees, says the charges by the IWW are baseless and it has, in all cases, denied wrongdoing. While it confirms that only 42% of its employees participate in its health insurance plan, it says many opt out because they have coverage through another employer or family member.
The Seattle-based company has been viewed widely as a model employer. But its current labour troubles and approach to addressing them may spell trouble for that responsible image.
Name games
Although the sums have been small – totalling about $165,000 – with its history of settling labour charges to “avoid unnecessary costs”, Starbucks may, in fact, be validating the unions’ claims against it and selling out its hard-won reputation.
As Zac Bissonnette of bloggingstocks.com points out, with “the demographic Starbucks appeals to … the legal costs to the company may not be material, [but] the intangible damage could be very material”. And he warns that Starbucks’ shareholders “will want to monitor these stories closely”. Investors have, for a number of reasons, seen the company’s share price drop 23% in the past year.
While Starbucks tells Ethical Corporation that it has settled in the past to avoid “protracted litigation over relatively minor charges” and the “unnecessary allocation of resources on both sides”, it says it will move forward with litigation in New York and not settle.
In trying to protect shareholders from legal costs, Starbucks may be putting a dent in its greatest corporate asset – its good name. If it truly is not “union busting”, the time has come to bite the short-term financial bullet and prove it legally and in the court of public opinion.
|
Cinema Workers in CA Make Gains By Bay Area Solidarity November 06, 2007 For over a year, our fellow workers on the west coast have been organizing at Shattuck Cinema in Berkeley, CA. The cinema workers are organized with the IWW and have made significant gains in the past year.
Owned by the national conglomerate Landmark Theatres, Shattuck Cinema had a habit of violating its own policies. For example, employees are supposed to be reviewed three times a year, and receive raises accordingly. The theater neglected to follow this procedure, causing employees to miss out on raises.
Employees decided to join the IWW and file Unfair Labor Practice charges against Landmark. Since then, employees have begun to receive their regular reviews and wage increases. They have also been negotiating with management, and had a bargaining session on Sept 5th.
Here is an update from our fellow workers in Berkeley:
The Shattuck Cinema Workers Union Is United and Strong. . .
. . .but your continued solidarity is essential!
What you can do to support the Shattuck Union:
(1) Email the owner, Mark Cuban and tell him to respect workers rights - Mark Cuban's website where you can contact him is blogmaveric.com
(2) Email the company and demand better working conditions: customerservice@landmarktheaters.com
(3) Join the IWW and organize your theater. For information about organizing, please visit this page.
(4) Visit the Shattuck Cinema, in Berkeley, and tell the workers you support them.
(5) Contact the Bay Area IWW and ask us for further ideas for providing solidarity and support.
|
|